Comparison of Transcervical Resection and Loop Electrosurgical Excision for the Treatment of Grade Ⅰ Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
- VernacularTitle:宫腔镜宫颈病变电切术与宫颈环形电切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤样病变Ⅰ级的对比研究
- Author:
Hongwei ZHANG
;
Xishi LIU
;
Rong SHEN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia;
Transcervical resection of cervical lesion;
Loop electrosurgical excision procedure
- From:
Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
2005;0(11):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the efficacy of transcervical resection(TCRC)and loop electrosurgical excision procedure(LEEP)for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade I(CINⅠ).Methods A total of 231 CIN I patients were divided into two groups according to their patient number to receive TCRC or LEEP.The resected specimens were sent for pathological diagnosis and human papilloma virus(HPV)-16/18 test.Results No significant difference was found in the operation time[(14.1?2.2)min vs.(13.8?2.1)min],rates of wound infection and cervical stricture[1.7%(2/115)vs.1.7%(2/116)and 0.9%(1/115)vs.1.7%(2/116)],and rates of cure and recurrence [99.1%(107/108)vs.99.1%(108/109)and 0.9%(1/108)vs.0.9%(1/109)] between the TCRC and LEEP groups(t=1.060,P=0.290;?2=0.000,P=1.000;?2=0.000,P=1.000;?2=0.000,P=1.000;?2=0.000,P=1.000).In the TCRC group,the surgical wound was healed in(5.0?0.6)weeks,which was significantly shorter than that in the LEEP group[(5.2?0.7)weeks,t=-2.331,P=0.021].The patients who had severe endocervicitis in both the groups had similar rate of residual endocervicitis[16.7%(2/12)vs.53.8%(7/13),Fisher's test:P=0.097].In both the groups,one patient respectively showed residual lesion after the procedure,in whom HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 were detected.Conclusions Both TCRC and LEEP are effective for CINI.LEEP is easier to master than TCRC.Closed follow-up is essential of the with patients positive HPV-16 or-18.
