Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgeries for Patients With Colorectal Cancer Who Have Had a Previous Abdominal Surgery.
- Author:
Soeun PARK
1
;
Jeonghyun KANG
;
Eun Jung PARK
;
Seung Hyuk BAIK
;
Kang Young LEE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Colectomy; Laparoscopy; Robot; Colorectal surgery; Previous abdominal surgery
- MeSH: Colectomy; Colorectal Neoplasms*; Colorectal Surgery; Diet; Humans; Laparoscopy; Length of Stay
- From:Annals of Coloproctology 2017;33(5):184-191
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: The impact of previous abdominal surgery (PAS) on surgical outcomes from laparoscopic and robot surgeries is inconclusive. This study aimed to investigate the impact of PAS on perioperative outcomes from laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries. METHODS: From March 2007 to February 2014, a total of 612 and 238 patients underwent laparoscopic and robotic surgeries, respectively. Patients were divided into 3 groups: those who did not have a PAS (NPAS), those who had a major PAS, and those who had a minor PAS. We further divided the patients so that our final groups for analysis were: patients with NPAS (n = 478), major PAS (n = 19), and minor PAS (n = 115) in the laparoscopy group, and patients with NPAS (n = 202) and minor PAS (n = 36) in the robotic surgery group. RESULTS: In the laparoscopy group, no differences in the conversion rates between the 3 groups were noted (NPAS = 1.0% vs. major PAS = 0% vs. minor PAS = 1.7%, P = 0.701). In the robotic surgery group, the conversion rate did not differ between the NPAS group and the minor PAS group (1.0% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.390). Among the groups, neither the operation time, blood loss, days to soft diet, length of hospital stay, nor complication rate were affected by PAS. CONCLUSION: PAS did not jeopardize the perioperative outcomes for either laparoscopic or robotic colorectal surgeries. Therefore, PAS should not be regarded as an absolute contraindication for minimally invasive colorectal surgeries.
