Comparison of the Efficacy of Lichtenstein and Transabdominal Preperitoneal Patch Repair for Primary Inguinal Hernia in Adults
- VernacularTitle:平片无张力修补术与腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前补片植入术治疗成人原发性腹股沟疝的比较
- Author:
Yaojun YU
;
Ping JIANG
;
Tao YOU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Inguinal hernia;
Tension-free;
Laparoscope;
Herniorrhaphy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
2005;0(12):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the efficacy of Lichtenstein and transabdominal preperitoneal patch repair(TAPP) in the treatment of primary inguinal hernia in adults. Methods The clinical data of 223 patients who received Lichtenste and 121 patients who underwent TAPP in our hospital between January 2002 and January 2006,were analyzed retrospectively.The efficacy and complications of the two methods were compared.Results The rate of intraoperative injury of the inner organs in the TAPP group was significantly higher than that in the Lichtenstein group [5.8%(7/121) vs 0.4%(1/223),?2=7.626,P=0.006],while no significant difference was detected in the rate of abdominal organ injury between the two groups [0.8%(1/121) vs 3.1%(7/223),?2=0.969,P=0.325].The rate of postoperative complications in the TAPP group was significantly lower than that in the Lichtenstein group [14.0%(17/121) vs 36.3%(81/223),?2=18.881,P=0.000].In the TAPP group,during a follow-up of(14?7) months,one case of recurrence was found(0.8%).Whereas in the Lichtenstein group,the patients were followed up for(16?8) months,two of them had recurrence(0.9%).No significant difference existed in the recurrence rate between the two groups(?2=0.000,P=1.000).Conclusions Both the Lichtenstein and TAPP have benefits and drawbacks.Individulized therapy is recommended for the patients with inguinal hernia.It is important for surgeons to know the indications of the operations.
