A Comparison of the Clinical Effects Between Transurethral Plasmakinetic Resection and Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
- VernacularTitle:经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术和电切术治疗前列腺增生症的比较
- Author:
Guodong ZHAO
;
Yong CHEN
;
Jianxin LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Benign prostatic hyperplasia;
Transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate;
Transurethral resection of the prostate
- From:
Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
2005;0(10):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical effects of transurethral plasmakinetic resection(TUPR) with transurethral resection of the prostate(TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia.Methods From October 2003 to July 2006,a total of 127 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia was divided the into the TURP Group(n=62) and the TUPR Group(n=61) according to random number table by computer.1 case of neurogenic bladder and 3 cases of TURP failure were ruled out the study.Results As compared with the RTRP Group,the TUPR Group had less intraoperative blood loss[(78.5?46.2)ml vs(115.0?43.5)ml,t=4.511,P=0.000] and more weight of resected prostate[(60.5?29.3)g vs(45.9?30.5)g,t=2.709,P=0.008].The operation time in the two groups was similar[(93.4?35.5)min vs(81.3?46.3)min,t=1.629,P=0.106].There were no statistic differences in international prostate symptom score,quality of life,Qmax,residual urine and complication rate(2/61 vs 5/62).Conclusions Compared with TURP,transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate has the advantages of less blood loss and more entire resection of the prostate,so it might be more effective.
