Intraocular Lens Power Calculation after Refractive Surgery: A Comparative Analysis of Accuracy and Predictability.
- Author:
Byeong Soo KANG
1
;
Jeong Mo HAN
;
Joo Youn OH
;
Mee Kum KIM
;
Won Ryang WEE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Cataract; Intraocular lens; Refractive surgical procedures
- MeSH: Cataract; Humans; Lenses, Intraocular*; Methods; Refractive Errors; Refractive Surgical Procedures*; Retrospective Studies
- From:Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2017;31(6):479-488
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation using conventional regression formulae or the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) IOL power calculator for previous corneal refractive surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 96 eyes from 68 patients that had undergone cataract surgery after keratorefractive surgeries. We calculated the formula with two approaches: IOL powers using the ASCRS IOL power calculator and IOL powers using conventional formulae with previous refractive data (Camellin, Jarade, Savini, and clinical history method) or without prior data (0, 2 and, 4 mm total mean power in topography, Wang-Koch-Maloney, Shammas, Seitz, and Maloney). Two conventional IOL formulae (the SRK/T and the Hoffer Q) were calculated with the single K and double K methods. Mean arithmetic refractive error and mean absolute error were calculated at the first postoperative month. RESULTS: In conventional formulae, the Jarade method or the Seitz method, applied in the Hoffer Q formula with the single K or double K method, have the lowest prediction errors. The least prediction error was found in the Shammas-PL method in the ASCRS group. There was no statistically significant difference between the 10 lowest mean absolute error conventional methods, the Shammas-PL method and the Barrett True-K method calculated with using the ASCRS calculator, without using preoperative data. CONCLUSIONS: The Shammas-PL formula and the Barrett True-K formula, calculated with the ASCRS calculator, without using history, were methods comparable to the 10 most accurate conventional formulae. Other methods using the ASCRS calculator show a myopic tendency.
