Clinical Characteristics of Acute Epididymitis in Children and Adults.
- Author:
Chang Hyun PARK
1
;
Jae Kyu IM
;
Ki Kyung KIM
;
Heung Won PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Hallym University, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Acute epididymitis;
Children;
Antibiotics
- MeSH:
Adult*;
Anti-Bacterial Agents;
Blood Cell Count;
Child*;
Diagnosis;
Epididymis;
Epididymitis*;
Fever;
Humans;
Male;
Medical Records;
Physical Examination;
Pyuria;
Retrospective Studies;
Urinalysis;
Urinary Tract Infections
- From:Korean Journal of Urology
1999;40(6):674-676
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: We investigated if there are some differences in clinical charecteristics of acute epididymitis between child and adult and if ordinary therapeutic regimen based on antibiotics is the most appropriate one. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed medical records of 64 patients with acute epididymitis retrospectively, who took admission treatment from July, 1996 to June, 1998 at our hospital. These patients were divided into two groups, child and adult group, younger and older than 16 years respectively. The diagnosis of acute epididymitis was made by symptoms, physical examinations, doppler sonography, and/or radionuclide scan. Chronic epididymitis, recurrent epididymitis, patients taken antibiotics before admission, and surgical epididymis were excluded from this study. We investigated the age of the patients, symptoms, symptom duration and signs. Complete blood count, urinalysis, and urine culture were performed. Independent-samples T-test was used for the comparative analysis of the results. RESULTS: Symptoms including scrotal swelling and pain were not different between two groups significantly. Signs including scrotal tenderness, fever, and leucocytosis were not different between two groups significantly. However, there were statistically significant differences between two groups in studies of urine. Pyuria or positive urine culture were 20.8%(5 of 24) in child group and 52.5%(21 of 40) in adult group(p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In acute epididymitis, evidences of urinary tract infection were significantly lower in children than in adults. So, although further studies are needed to find out the exact cause of acute epididymitis, at least ordinary therapeutic regimen based on antibiotics would not be the best one for the majority of children without evidence of urinary tract infection.
