A study on direct percutaneous coronary intervention contrast thrombolytic or conservative theapy in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction
- VernacularTitle:ST段抬高急性心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与溶栓或保守治疗的对比研究
- Author:
Yin LIU
;
Yingyi ZHANG
;
Yuqian LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Myocardial infarction;
Angioplasty, transluminal, percutaneous coronary
- From:
Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
2003;0(06):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of direct percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (AMI) Methods From April 2000 to April 2004, 458 patients with ST segment elevation AMI were randomized to receive invasive therapy ( n =205) or non invasive therapy ( n =253) Comparison was made in the 30 day mortality rate, major cardiac events rate, reinfarction rate during hospitalization, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and end diastolic diameter (EDD) of echocardiograph in 2 weeks after AMI between the 2 groups The PCI group was divided into 3 sub groups according to number of stenosis artries found during angiography We try to find not the relation between left ventricular function and the number of coronary artery with stenosis Results The result of selective coronary artery angiography in 205 PCI patients was: 66 patients with single branch lesion (32 2%), 68 patients with double branches lesion (33 2%) and 71 patients with triple branches lesion (34 6%) 203 patients were operated successfully (99%), 228 stents were placed on lesions, 194 patients (94 6%) obtained TIMI grade Ⅲ perfusion of the IRA Compared the invasive with the non invasive group, the in hospital 30 day mortality rate was 2 9% vs 9 1% ( P
