A comparison between hysteroscopic electroresection and open hysterectomy for intrauterine benign diseases
- VernacularTitle:宫腔镜电切术与开腹子宫切除术治疗子宫内良性病变的疗效比较
- Author:
Zhanqing LI
;
Enlan XIA
;
Yuhua ZHANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Hysteroscopy;
Electroresection;
Submucous uterine myoma;
Intrauterine disease
- From:Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
2001;0(06):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical effects between hysteroscopic electroresection and open hysterectomy in the treatment of intrauterine benign diseases. Methods A total of 58 women with intrauterine benign received hysteroscopic electroresection (hysteroscopic group) and 60 women underwent open total hysterectomy (control group). The operating time, hospital stay, postoperative recovery and cure rates were compared between the two groups, respectively. Results The operating time was 68.4?20.6 min in control group and 55.2?19.7 min in hysteroscopic group ( t=-3.555, P =0.000). The postoperative hospital stay was 7.2?1.8 d and 4.5?1.5 d in control and hysteroscopic group, respectively ( t=-8.836, P =0.000). The time to resume regular work was 64.4?25.3 d in control group and 37.2?7.8 d in hysteroscopic group ( t=-7.835, P =0.000). The cure rates in control and hysteroscopic group were 100% (60/60) and 94.7% (54/57), respectively ( ? 2 =1.477, P =0.224). Conclusions Hysteroscopic electroresection gives good short-term therapeutic effects and quick postoperative recovery. It may replace hysterectomy in part of patients with intrauterine benign diseases.
