Laparoscopic enterodialysis versus open enterodialysis: A comparison study
- VernacularTitle:腹腔镜与开腹肠粘连松解术的对比研究
- Author:
Zhiming WU
;
Jianping LOU
;
Xingcheng MENG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Laparoscopy;
Intestinal obstruction;
Intestinal adhesion
- From:Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
2001;0(01):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical efficiency between laparoscopic enterodialysis and open enterodialysis. Methods Clinical data of 25 cases of adhesive intestinal obstruction treated by laparoscopic enterodialysis (Laparoscopic Group) from December 1999 to December 2002 were retrospectively reviewed and compared with clinical records of 23 cases receiving open enterodialysis (Open Group) in the same period. The operating time, intra-operative blood loss, incidence of complications, postoperative recovery time of bowel movement and length of hospital stay of the two groups were compared, respectively. Results In the Laparoscopic Group operation was successfully accomplished in 23 cases while a conversion to open surgery was required in 2 cases. Of the Laparoscopic Group and the Open Group, the operation time was (58.3?8.1) min and (84.0?7.5) min (t=11.383, P=0.000), respectively; the intra-operative blood loss was (31.4?5.1) ml and (192.6?26.4) ml (t=29.995, P=0.000), respectively; the postoperative hospital stay was (4.1?1.4) days and (9.7?2.0) days (t=11.413, P=0.000), respectively; the postoperative recovery time of bowel function was (19.6?2.2) hours and (49.0?8.8) hours (t=16.207, P=0.000), respectively and the postoperative complications were seen in 1 case and 9 cases (?2=6.960, P=0.008), respectively. Conclusions Compared with open enterodialysis, laparoscopic enterodialysis has advantages of short operation time, less blood loss, rapid recovery and fewer complications.
