Comparison of pressure bandage with ultrasound-guided compression for pseudoaneurysms after percutaneous coronary intervention
- VernacularTitle:超声指导下压迫与局部加压包扎修复冠状动脉介入术后假性动脉瘤
- Author:
Yin ZHANG
;
Qiang LU
;
Changsheng MA
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Pseudoaneurysm/ultrastruct;
Percutaneous coronary intervention;
Ultrasound-guided compression repair;
Pressure bandage
- From:
Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
2003;0(06):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the effects of pressure bandage with ultrasound-guided compression repair (UGCR) for femoral artery pseudoaneurysms (FAPs) after percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods One hundred and five patients with FAPs were enrolled in the study. Patients were classified into 2 groups (UGCR vs pressure bandage) according to different treatment modalities,and clinical status and therapeutic effects were compared. Results There were no differences between the two groups in gender,age,body mass index,type of intervention,sheath size,anti-platelet agents,low molecular weight heparin,systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure during the procedure. The successful repair rate was higher in the UGCR group than that of the pressure bandage group (85% vs 63%,P =0.03). No complications occurred in both groups. Conclusion UGCR is simple and safe with low cost and complications,which can be used preferably for FAPs repair.
