A comparison between microwave endometrial ablation and total hysterectomy
- VernacularTitle:微波子宫内膜消除术与全子宫切除术的比较
- Author:
Hua LIN
;
Meilu BIAN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Microwave endometrial ablation;
Menorrhagia;
Total hysterectomy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
2001;0(04):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the curative effects between microwave endometrial ablation (MEA) and total hysterectomy for the treatment of menorrhagia. Methods Sixty patients with menorrhagia were divided into 2 groups with 30 patients in each group, either to MEA or to total hysterectomy (control group). The intraoperative blood loss, operating time, sparing or unsparing of uterus, and length of recovery of the 2 groups were compared. Results The effective rates for menorrhagia, operating time, and mean blood loss of MEA group and control group was 96% (29/30) and 100% (30/30) (?2=0,P=1.0), (4.0?1.1) min and (68.3?1.9) min (t=-160.42, P=0.00), 0 ml and 50 ml, respectively. Conclusions MEA is a novel minimally invasive method for menorrhagia, and its curative effects are similar to that of total hysterectomy. When considered in terms of sparing of uterus and postoperative recovery, MEA is obviously superior to total hysterectomy.
