Management of Split Thickness Skin Graft Donor Site: Comparison of Different Biologic Dressing Materials (Kaloderm® vs Xe-derma®).
- Author:
Tae Bin YUN
1
;
Woon Hyeok JEONG
;
Jae Hoon CHOI
;
Jun Hyung KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dongsan Medical Center, School of Medicine & Institute for Medical Science, Keimyung University, Daegu, Korea. med69@dsmc.or.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Split thickness skin graft;
Donor site;
Biologic dressing;
Xe-derma®
- MeSH:
Bandages;
Biological Dressings*;
Humans;
Skin*;
Tissue Donors*;
Transplants*;
Wound Healing;
Wounds and Injuries
- From:Journal of Korean Burn Society
2016;19(1):6-11
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: With the advances of knowledge in wound healing process and technology in various fields, dressing material of the split thickness skin graft (STSG) donor site was improved. Recently, biologic dressing materials attracted attention and these are used for wound management. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of Xe-derma® (porcine acellular dermal matrix) with Kaloderm® (cultured epithelial autografts) for treatment of the donor site. METHODS: From July 2015 to January 2016, 20 patients who had undergone STSG were enrolled. The grafts harvested with a same manner and the donor sites were managed with Xe-derma® or Kaloderm®. We compared days for re-epithelization, number of dressings, ease of application, ease of wound monitoring, pain level and complications. RESULTS: All patients managed by these dressing materials were well healed without any complications. There is no statistically difference (P=0.830) between the days for re-epithelization of Xe-derma® (11.10±0.944) and Kaloderm® (11.00±1.054). Number of dressings of Xe-derma® (1.2±0.421) was lower than Kaloderm® (2.3±0.483). Ease of application of Kaloderm® (7.40±0.516) was easier than Xe-derma® (6.36±0.343). Ease of wound monitoring of Xe-derma® (7.77±0.856) was easier than Kaloderm® (6.25±0.720). Xe-derma® was more painless in 1 day and 3 days after operation than Kaloderm®. CONCLUSION: Advantageous properties of Xe-derma® are improving wound healing, reducing pain by contact to the wound immediately after application and easy of wound monitoring due to its transparency. Therefore, we expected Xe-derma® can be used for management of various wound.
