Comparative study on the effects of refractory wound after breast polyacrylamide hydrogel removing operations of the two drainage ways
- VernacularTitle:2种负压引流方式对聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶注射式隆胸取出术后切口不愈合效果的对比研究
- Author:
Peng WANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Polyacrylamide hydrogel;
Breast augmentation surgery;
Drainnage way;
Refractory wound
- From:
Journal of Chongqing Medical University
2003;0(05):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To observe and compare the wound healing effects,the time and costs of hospitalization of the two drainage ways in the breast polyacrylamide hydrogel removing operations by a prospective randomized controlled approach.Methods:From December 2004 to December 2009,a total of 54 breast-side of 40 patients,whose incision were not healing after breast polyacrylamide hydrogel removing operations,were divided into two groups.Both gorups'skin incision were on the areola or inframammary crease.In the case of removing the polyacrylamide hydrogel during the operation as much as possible,a new incision,approximately 1.5cm,was produced below the inframammary crease approximately 5cm,the negative drainage tube was inserted into the new incision in the A group(distal drainage way),While the negative drainage tube was inserted into the original incision in B group(In-situ drainage way).Results:The breast appearance was flat and thin,the texture was soft and there was no mass or sclerosis.There were significant differences between the two methods in primary healing,the time and costs of hospitalization.Conclusion:The clinical effect of the distal drainage way is better than the clinical effect of the In-situ drainage way,and it deserves to apply in clinical practice.
