The Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of State Adult Attachment Measure.
10.4306/jknpa.2012.51.4.147
- Author:
Sung Deok PARK
1
;
Woo Kyeong LEE
Author Information
1. Yong-in Mental Hospital, Yongin, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Adult attachment;
State;
Trait;
Exploratory factor analysis
- MeSH:
Adult;
Affective Symptoms;
Anxiety;
Appointments and Schedules;
Depression;
Humans;
Psychotherapy;
Surveys and Questionnaires;
Reproducibility of Results
- From:Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association
2012;51(4):147-155
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: Adult attachment is a relatively stable disposition, rooted in internal working models of self and relationship patterns. However, findings reported from recent research have suggested that levels of attachment anxiety, avoidance, and security are also affected by situational factors. The State Adult Attachment Measure (SAAM) was developed for the purpose of capturing temporary fluctuations in the sense of attachment security and insecurity. In this study, we examined the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the State Adult Attachment Measure (K-SAAM). METHODS: K-SAAM, Experiences in Close Relationships Questionnaire-Revised (ECR-R), Relationship Questionnaire (RQ), Korean version of Positive Affective and Negative Affect Schedule (K-PANAS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (R-DAS), and Toronto Alexithymia Scale 20-K (TAS 20-K) were administered to 180 subjects in the community. Exploratory factor analyses and correlation analyses among related variables were conducted. RESULTS: Scores on the K-SAAM demonstrated high internal consistency, with corrected item-total correlations from .56 to .87. Results of exploratory factor analysis yielded three reliable subscales measuring state levels of attachment-related anxiety, avoidance, and security. Results of additional analyses demonstrated both convergent validity and discriminant validity of the K-SAAM. CONCLUSION: The results reported here are highly supportive of the reliability, validity, and utility of the K-SAAM as a state measure of attachment. This new measure will allow clinicians to assess various temporary changes in attachment levels and to examine the efficacy of attachment-based psychotherapy. The K-SAAM has the potential to advance the field in understanding of the dynamics of adult attachment.
