Clinical characteristics of constipation associated with diabetes mellitus.
- Author:
Taeg Soo KIM
1
;
Jeong Sik BYEON
;
Seung Jae MYUNG
;
Suk Kyun YANG
;
Jung Eun KO
;
Oh Ryoun KWON
;
In Ja YOON
;
Jeong Min KANG
;
Hyun Woo KIM
;
Jung Min AHN
;
Soon Joo KIM
;
Ji Yun JO
;
Kee Don CHOI
;
Gin Hyug LEE
;
Hwoon Yong JUNG
;
Weon Seon HONG
;
Jin Ho KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. jsbyeon@amc.seoul.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Constipation;
Colon transit time;
Biofeedback therapy;
Diabetes
- MeSH:
Anal Canal;
Biofeedback, Psychology;
Chungcheongnam-do;
Colon;
Constipation*;
Defecography;
Diabetes Mellitus*;
Humans;
Manometry;
Time and Motion Studies
- From:Korean Journal of Medicine
2006;70(5):527-534
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Constipation occurs frequently in diabetes mellitus (DM). However, there are few reports that investigated the characteristics of constipation associated with DM. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical features of constipation associated with DM. METHODS: Among constipated patients who visited Asan Medical Center from January 2000 to December 2004, 45 patients with DM (DM group) and 104 patients without DM (non-DM group) were included in this study. We reviewed the clinical presentation, results of anorectal manometry, colon transit time study, and defecogram. We also analyzed the response to biofeedback therapy. RESULTS: The severity of constipation symptoms before treatment was not different between DM and non-DM group. Patients with colon transit time over 56 hours were more frequent in DM group than in non-DM group (21/45, 46.7% vs. 31/104, 29.8% ; p=0.047). Among DM group, colon transit time and the duration of DM showed positive correlation (r=0.431, p=0.003). The resting anal sphincter pressure was significantly lower in DM group than in non-DM group (43.5+/-21.5 mmHg vs. 51.7+/-22.6 mmHg ; p=0.048). The results of defecography were similar between DM and non-DM group. Successful responses to biofeedback therapy were not different between DM and non-DM group (19/34, 55.9% vs. 43/79, 54.4% ; p=0.887). CONCLUSIONS: Slow transit constipation was more frequent in DM group than in non-DM group. The successful responses to biofeedback therapy appear to be similar between DM and non-DM group.
