Comparison of different ways of pulling out ureter double-J stent in females
- VernacularTitle:女性患者不同方式取出输尿管双J管的比较
- Author:
Hang LIU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Double-J stent;
Cystoscope;
Rat-tooth forceps;
Blood vessel forceps;
Pull out
- From:
Journal of Chongqing Medical University
2007;0(08):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the different ways of pulling out ureter double-J stent in females.Methods:172 female patients requiring urter double-J stent for different cases were chosen,including upper urinary calculus(150 cases),hydronephrosis with urterostenosis(14 cases),Ormond’s syndrome(3 cases) and postradiotherapy of uterine cervix cancer(5 cases).These cases were divided into three groups with different ways of pulling out the urter double-J stent.Results:The achievement ratio of cystoscope(100%) and rat-tooth forceps(98.1%) were higher than the blood vessel forceps(92.1%).Conclusion:The cystoscope operation requires the special equipment and cost more money and time.Compared to the blood vessel forceps,using the rat-tooth forceps to pull out the female ureter double-J stent is safe and more effective.
