Podcasting in medical education: a review of the literature.
- Author:
Daniel CHO
1
;
Michael COSIMINI
;
Juan ESPINOZA
Author Information
- Publication Type:Webcasts ; Review
- Keywords: Medical education; Graduate medical education; Continuing medical education; Webcasts as topic
- MeSH: Accidental Falls; Education, Medical*; Education, Medical, Continuing; Education, Medical, Graduate; Humans; Learning; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Webcasts as Topic
- From:Korean Journal of Medical Education 2017;29(4):229-239
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: Podcasts are increasingly being used for medical education, both within teaching institutions and on an international scale by major journals. To date, there are no evidence-based guidelines for the development of educational podcasts. To review the state of the literature, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and ERIC were searched in May 2016 for articles describing audio format podcasts used in medical education. Eighty-four articles met inclusion criteria. A qualitative synthesis of the evidence was done using Kirkpatrick’s model for evaluating outcomes. Twenty-four articles described reaction outcomes, eleven described learning outcomes, and one described behavioral outcomes. None measured patient impact. The literature demonstrates that podcasts are both feasible and accepted by learners. The mean length of reported podcasts was 18 minutes, which falls within the recommended range in at least one paper, and is consistent with reported listener preference. Interview format, clear disclosures, and accurate information were reported as desirable. There is limited evidence showing the efficacy of podcasts as teaching tools, or regarding best practices in making podcasts. More rigorous studies evaluating efficacy, changes in behavior, and changes in patient outcomes need to be performed in order to prove podcasts’ value and to justify production costs.
