Comparison of 2 radiofrequency ablation methods in idiopathic left posterior fasci-cular ventricular tachycardia
- VernacularTitle:特发性左后分支室性心动过速2种消融方法的对比分析
- Author:
Fengpeng JIA
;
Han LEI
;
Kanghua MA
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
idiopathic ventricular tachycardia;
electrophysiology;
catheter ablation,radiofrequency current;
left posterior fascicular
- From:Journal of Third Military Medical University
2003;0(07):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate whether taking diastolic potential(DP)and earliest Purkinje potential(PP)as ablation targets together is superior to taking earliest PP alone in patients with left posterior fascicular ventricular tachycardia(VT).MethodsTotally 18 patients who were admitted in our department from May 2006 to May 2009 were enrolled,and the results of their electrophysiological examination were analyzed.According to radiofrequency(RF)ablation targets,patients were classified into 2 groups:DP+PP group(DP and PP as ablation targets together)and PP group(PP as the target alone).Successful RF ablation was established when the ventricular tachycardia was no longer inducible.The acute success rate,recurrent rate,number of ablation application,procedure time,X-ray exposure and complications were compared between DP+PP and PP groups.ResultsThere was 1 case receiving no ablation because of not being induced to clinical VT.Seventeen cases were induced to clinical VT and displayed right bundle branch block(RBBB)and left axis morphology(DP+PP group 7 cases,and PP group 10 cases).All cases were successfully ablated,their DP-Q interval and PP-Q interval were 60.17?8.16 and 30.64?7.19 ms,respectively.There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the age,ventricular tachycardial cycle,procedure time and recurrent rate.Compared to the PP group,the number of RF application in DP+PP group was fewer(4.55?2.07 vs 7.50?1.64,P=0.04),and X-ray exposure time was a little longer(18.33?1.51 min vs 15.37?2.77 min,P=0.03).There was neither left posterior fascicular block nor other complications seen in the 2 groups.The follow-up period was 14.29?10.05 months,and during this there was 1 case recurrence in DP group(2 months after procedure)and 1 case in PP group(1 month after procedure)respectively.ConclusionThe 2 methods are effective and safe for successful ablation of left posterior fascicular VT.Compared to ablation of earliest PP site alone,ablation of DP+PP might need fewer times of RF application but longer X-ray exposure time.
