Three strategies for hemostasis at femoral artery access site: a comparison of safety and efficacy
- VernacularTitle:三种止血方法在股动脉穿刺部位止血中有效性和安全性的比较
- Author:
Hairong XU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
arterial puncture closing device;
cardiac catheterization;
hemostasis;
complication
- From:
Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University
1985;0(06):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To assess the safety and efficacy of the standard manual compression and 2 arterial puncture closing devices,Angioseal and Perclose,for hemostasis at the femoral artery access site in patients undergoing coronary angiography(CAG) or percutaneous coronary interventions(PCI).Methods: Totally 366 patients undergoing coronary angiography or PCI were assigned to receive either Angioseal(n=128),Perclose(n=110) or standard manual compression(n=128).The efficacy endpoint(immediate hemostasis,successful hemostasis rate,operating time,time of leg immobilization and time to hemostasis) and safety endpoint(vasovagal reflex,major complications,local complications,hematocrit drop,etc.) were evaluated.Risk factors(gender,age,body mass index,comorbid conditions,antiplatelet agents,and anticoagulant agents,etc.) were also analyzed.Results: The successful hemostasis rates were similar between Angioseal group and Perclose group,but the rate of immediate hemostasis of Angioseal group was higher than that of Perclose group(P
