Emergency cervical cerclage in advanced cervical incompetence.
- Author:
Sung Hee KIM
1
;
Sang Kook KIM
;
Eun Young PARK
;
Soo Kyung LEE
;
Tae Yong KIM
;
So Hee KIM
;
Sang Gap KIM
;
Hwa Sook MOON
Author Information
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Good MoonHwa Hospital, Korea. moonhwas@moonhwa.or.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Emergency cerclage;
Advanced cervical incompetence;
Membrane prolapse;
Amniocentesis
- MeSH:
Amniocentesis;
Birth Weight;
Cerclage, Cervical*;
Cervix Uteri;
Dilatation;
Emergencies*;
Female;
Gestational Age;
Humans;
Labor Stage, First;
Membranes;
Pregnancy;
Pregnancy Outcome;
Pregnancy Trimester, Second;
Pregnant Women;
Prolapse;
Retrospective Studies;
Survival Rate;
Vagina
- From:Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
2006;49(1):92-100
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical effectiveness of emergency cervical cerclage in pregnant women with advanced cervical incompetence in the second trimester. METHODS: This study analyzed retrospectively the pregnancy outcomes of 20 patients who were offered emergency cerclage between June 2000 and April 2004. Group I was defined as the patients cervical dilatation without membrane prolapse. Group II was the patients with membrane prolapse into vagina, who were underwent amniocentesis to decrease intraamniotic pressure. RESULTS: The mean+/-SD gestational age at cerclage was 21.6+/-2.4 weeks (Group I: 21.0+/-2.5, Group II: 22.1+/-2.3). The mean cervical dilatation was 2.5+/-0.9 cm (Group I: 1.8+/-0.5, Group II: 3.2+/-0.8) and mean effacement was 79.0+/-12.9% (Group I: 68.8+/-11.6, Group II: 87.3+/-6.4). The mean interval from cerclage to delivery was 9.4+/-5.3 weeks (Group I: 11.1+/-6.1, Group II: 7.9+/-3.7) and mean gestational age at delivery was 31.0+/-6.0 weeks (Group I: 32.2+/-7.4, Group II: 30.0+/-4.9). The birth weight was 1.9+/-1.1 kg (Group I: 2.4+/-1.4, Group II: 1.6+/-0.8) and the perinatal survival rate was 75% (Group I: 77%, Group II: 73%). Cervix dilatation and effacement were significantly more advanced in group II compared to the group I (p<0.05). However, the duration of pregnancy prolongation and birth weight, gestational age at the delivery were not significantly different between both groups. CONCLUSION: This results suggest that emergency cervical cerclage might be an effective treatment in advanced cervical incompetence, and that the concomitant amniocentesis could help the cerclage in the patients with membrane prolapse.
