Late course accelerated hyperfractionated irradiation combined with intraluminal hyperthermia for esophageal carcinoma
- VernacularTitle:后程加速超分割放疗联合腔内加热治疗食管癌前瞻性研究
- Author:
Guan LIU
;
Ying WANG
;
Xiaomao GUO
;
Xuehui SHI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Esophageal neoplasms/radiotherapy;
Dose fractionation;
Esophageal neoplasms/hyperthermia;
Prognosis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
1992;0(04):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the effect of late course accelerated hyperfractionated irradiation combined with intraluminal hyperthermia for esophageal carcinoma. Methods From March 2000 to October 2002, totally 91 such eligible patients were entered into the prospective randomized control trial of late course accelerated hyperfractionated irradiation (LCAH-, 44 patients) versus LCAH combined with intraluminal hyperthermia ( LCAH-HT-, 47 patients). Radiotherapy regimen consisted of conventional fractionation radiotherapy (1.8 ?Gy/f, 5f/w, totally 41.4 ?Gy/23fx) during the first two-thirds of the radiotherapy course, followed by accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy (1.5?Gy/f, 2f/d, with 6 h interval), using the cone-down fields, to a total dose of 68.4?Gy/41fx . Hyperthermia was given weekly during conventional fractionation irradiation, totally 4 times. Results The CR and PR rates were 47.7% and 72.3%, 52.3%and 27.8% in the LCAH arm and LCAH-HT group,respectively(P=0.016). The median survivals were 30.3 and 30.6 months,the 1-,2-,3-year survival rates were 77.3%,57.4% ,37.3% and 80.5%,68.6%, 46.3%(P= 0.526 ), the 1-,2-,3-year local control rates were 86.3%,70.5%,56.5% and 92.4%,72.5%,65.5% (P= 0.686 )in the LCAH group and LCAH-HT group,respectively. Grade III and severer of esophagitis were 18.2% and 27.6% in LCAH and LCAH-HT (P= 0.498 ), Grade III and severer tracheitis were 11.4% and 19.2% respectively (P=0.191). Conclusions The immediate effect of LCAH combined with hyperthermia is better than that of LCAH alone. Additional hyperthermia to LCAH does not increase the likelihood of radiation injury.
