An Experimental Examination Of Multimodal Imagine System For Implant Site Assessment.
- Author:
Chang Seo PARK
1
;
Kee Deog KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Dental Radiology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- MeSH:
Cadaver;
Dental Implants;
Mandible;
Radiography;
Radiography, Dental, Digital;
Radiography, Panoramic;
Stents;
Vertical Dimension
- From:Journal of Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
1998;28(1):7-16
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The scanora X-ray unit uses the principles of narrow beam radiography and spiral tomography. Starting with a panoramic overview as a scout image, multiple tomographic projection could be selected. This study evaluated the accuracy of spiral tomography in comparison to routine panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planing. An experimental study was performed on a cadaver mandible to assess the accuracy of panoramic radiography and spiral tomography film images for measurement of metallic spheres. After radiographic images of the metallic spheres on the surgical stent were measured and corrected for a fixed magnification of radiographic images, following results were obtained. 1. In the optimal position of the mandible, the minimal horizontal and vertical distortion was evident in the panoramic radiography images. The mean horizontal and vertical magnification error in anterior sites was 5.25% and 0.75%, respectively. The mean horizontal and vertical magnification error in posterior sites was 0.50% and 1.50%, respectively. 2. In the displaced forward or in and eccentric position of the mandible, the magnification error of the panoramic radiography images increased significantly over the optimal position. Overall, the mean horizontal magnification error of the anterior site in the different position changed dramatically within a range of -17.25% to 39.00%, compared to the posterior range of -5.25% to 8.50%. However, the mean vertical magnification error stayed with the range of 0.5% to 3.75% for all the mandibular positions. 3. The magnification effects in the tomographic scans were nearly identical for the anterior and posterior with a range of 2.00% to 5.75% in the horizontal and 4.50% to 5.50% in the vertical dimension, respectively. 4. A statistically significant difference between the anterior and posterior measurements was found in the horizontal measurements of the panoramic radiography images of the displaced dorward and backward position of the mandiblw(P<0.05). also a significant difference between the optimal panoramic and tomographic projections was found only in the vertical measurement (P<0.05).
