The relationship between the TMJ internal derangement state including rotational displacement and perforation and the clinical characteristics.
- Author:
Hwan Seok JEONG
1
;
Dong Soo YOU
Author Information
1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- MeSH:
Arthrography;
Humans;
Temporomandibular Joint*
- From:Journal of Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
1998;28(1):205-213
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
This study was designed to reveal the correlationship between the internal derangement state of TMJ and clinical characteristics including pain and mandibular dusfuntion. One hundred and twenty five subjects with TMJ signs and symptoms were chosen for two years. The level of pain and mandibular dysfuntion were evaluated by Visual Analog Scale(VAS) and Craniomandibular Index(CMI). The diagnostic categories of TMJ internal derangement were determined by arthrography and they included normal disc position, anterior disc displacement with reduction(ADDR), rotational disc displacement with reduction(RDDR), andterior disc displacement without reduction(ADDNR), and rotational disc displacement without reduction(RDDNR). Also disc perforation was used as a criteria to divide the diagnostic subgroups. The obtained results were as follows ; 1. The patient distribution of each group was 5 in normal disc position(4%), 40 in ADDR(32%), 30 in RDDR(24%), 34 in ADDNR(27%), and 16 in RDDNR(13%). 2. Perforation was observed in 8% of ADDR, 10% of RDDR, 32% of ADDNR, and 19% of RDDNR. 3. CMI of perforation group was higher than that of reduction or normal group(P<0.005), but vas showed no significant difference. 4. CMI of non-reduction group was higher than that of non-perforation group in reduction group(P<0.05). 5. There were no significant differences of CMI and VAS between anterior disc displacement group and rotational disc displacement group in both reduction and non-reduction group. 6. CMI of RDDNR group was higher than that of RDDR group(P<0.05). 7. There were no significant difference of CMI and VAS between bilateral involvement group and unilateral involvement group(p>0.05).
