Single-incision Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.
- Author:
Yoontaek LEE
1
;
Hyung Ho KIM
Author Information
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords: Stomach neoplasms; Laparoscopy; Gastrectomy
- MeSH: Early Detection of Cancer; Gastrectomy*; Hospitalization; Korea; Laparoscopy; Methods; Mortality; Pain, Postoperative; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Stomach Neoplasms*
- From:Journal of Gastric Cancer 2017;17(3):193-203
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: The implementation of national cancer screening has increased the detection rates of early gastric cancer (EGC) in Korea. Since the successful introduction of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the early 1990s, this technique has demonstrated improved short-term outcomes without compromising long-term oncologic results. It is associated with reduced pain, shorter hospitalization, reduced morbidity rates, better cosmetic outcomes, and equivalent mortality rates as those for open surgery. Laparoscopic gastrectomy improves patients' quality of life (QOL) and provides favorable prognosis. Single-incision laparoscopic gastrectomy (SILG) is one extremely minimally invasive method, theoretically offering improved cosmetic results, less postoperative pain, and earlier recovery after surgery than conventional multiport laparoscopic gastrectomy. In this context, SILG is thought to be an optimal method to promote and maximize patients' QOL in the acute postoperative phase. However, the technical difficulties of this procedure have limited its use. Since the first report describing single-incision distal gastrectomy in 2011, only 16 studies to date have evaluated SILG. Most of these studies have focused on the technical feasibility and safety of SILG because its long-term outcomes have not been reported. This article reviews the advantages and limitations of SILG.
