A Promising Method for Tumor Localization during Total Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy: Preoperative Endoscopic Clipping based on Negative Biopsy and Selective Intraoperative Radiography Findings.
- Author:
Joo Weon CHUNG
1
;
Kyung Won SEO
;
Kyoungwon JUNG
;
Moo In PARK
;
Sung Eun KIM
;
Seun Ja PARK
;
Sang Ho LEE
;
Yeon Myung SHIN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Stomach neoplasms; Laparoscopy; Gastrectomy; Tumor localization; Negative biopsy
- MeSH: Biopsy*; Endoscopy; Gastrectomy*; Humans; Laparoscopy; Methods*; Radiography*; Radiography, Abdominal; Retrospective Studies; Stomach Neoplasms
- From:Journal of Gastric Cancer 2017;17(3):220-227
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: Precise localization of tumors and creation of sufficient proximal resection margins are complicated processes during total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) for clinical T1/T2 gastric cancers. Various solutions to this problem have also yielded many disadvantages. In this study, we reviewed a preoperative endoscopic clipping method based on the results of negative biopsy and selective intraoperative radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 345 consecutive patients who underwent TLDG and preoperative endoscopic clipping for tumor localization was conducted. During preoperative endoscopy, the endoscopists performed negative biopsies just 1–2 cm selectively above the tumor's upper limit. After confirming the biopsy results, endoscopic metal clips were applied just proximal to the negative biopsy site the day before surgery. Selective intraoperative tumor localization using portable abdominal radiography was performed only when we could not ensure a precise resection line. RESULTS: Negative biopsy was performed in 244 patients. Larger tumor size (P=0.008) and more distally located tumors (P=0.052) were observed more frequently in the negative biopsy group than in the non-negative biopsy group. The non-negative biopsy group had significantly higher frequencies of differentiated tumor types than the negative biopsy group (P=0.003). Of the 244 patients who underwent negative biopsies, 6 had cancer cells in their biopsy specimens. We performed intraoperative radiography in 12 patients whose tumors had difficult-to-determine proximal margins. No tumors were found in the proximal resection margins of any patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our tumor localization method is a promising and accurate method for securing a sufficient resection margin during TLDG.
