- Author:
Kyong Choun CHI
1
;
Joong Min PARK
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Gastrectomy; Laparoscopy; Learning curve; Stomach neoplasms
- MeSH: Gastrectomy*; Laparoscopy; Learning; Learning Curve; Length of Stay; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Postoperative Complications; Stomach Neoplasms; Surgeons
- From:Journal of Gastric Cancer 2017;17(3):237-245
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: Senior surgeons prefer open gastrectomy (OG), while young surgeons prefer laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of LG performed by a senior surgeon who was an expert in OG during his learning period, by comparing them with LGs performed by a young surgeon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A senior surgeon performed 50 curative gastrectomies with laparoscopy (LG-S group) from March 2015 to August 2016. A young surgeon's initial 50 LGs comprised the LG-Y group. Clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared between the LG-S and LG-Y groups. RESULTS: D2 lymphadenectomy was more frequently performed in the LG-S group than in the LG-Y group (P=0.029). The operation time and number of retrieved lymph nodes did not significantly differ between the 2 surgeons (P=0.258 and P=0.410, respectively). Postoperative hospital stay and postoperative complication rate were similar between 2 groups (P=0.234 and P=1.000, respectively). Similarly, significant decreases in operation time with increasing case numbers were observed for both surgeons, whereas the number of retrieved lymph nodes increased significantly in the LG-Y group but not in the LG-S group. CONCLUSIONS: The LG outcomes when performed by the senior surgeon were comparable to those when performed by the young surgeon, despite performing more extended lymphadenectomies. Senior surgeons who are experts in OG should not refrain from performing LG.