Chinese Version of Nolen-Hoeksema Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS) Used in 912 College Students:Reliability and Validity
- VernacularTitle:Nolen-Hoeksema反刍思维量表在中国的试用
- Author:
Xiu HAN
;
Hongfei YANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
RRS;
Rumination;
Reliability;
Validity;
Gender difference
- From:Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
2006;0(05):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To explore the reliability and validity of Ruminative Responses Scale in Chinese version. Methods: A total of 912 Chinese college students completed the RRS. Results: All the indexes of confirmatory analysis including ?2、RMSEA、GFI、AGFI、NNFI、CFI、IFI met the requirements of psychological assessment. The ? coefficients of the scale and subscales and test -retest reliabilities were over 0.63. There was gender difference in rumination level. Conclusion: RRS is appropriate for the assessment of rumination in Chinese colleges.
