Comparison Between Allograft Mixed with Local Bone and Autograft in Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion.
- Author:
Kyu Jung CHO
1
;
Jung Yoon LEE
;
In Suk OH
;
Ryuh Sup KIM
;
Yoo Chul MO
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Inha University, Inchon, Korea. jungcho@inha.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Posterolateral lumbar fusion;
Allograft;
Local bone;
Autograft
- MeSH:
Allografts*;
Autografts*;
Humans;
Prospective Studies;
Scoliosis;
Spinal Fusion;
Transplants
- From:Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2000;7(4):565-570
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the usefulness of allograft and compare the result of allograft mixed with local bone and autograft in posterolateral lumbar fusion. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Allograft is used for the purpose of spinal fusion, especially in the scoliosis surgery. In some studies allograft is not recommended in posterior lumbar spinal fusion alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients underwent one level posterolateral lumbar fusion using freeze-dried allograft mixed with local bone. We compared them with twenty four patients using autogenous iliac bone graft mixed with local bone about radiographic fusion grading, duration of fusion and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Radiographic fusion grading of allograft was 7 cases of grade 1, 5 cases of grade 2, 3 cases of grade 3, and grading of autograft was 21 cases of grade 1, 2 cases of grade 2, 1 cases of grade 3. Bone fusion was complete after 11.1 months in allograft and 6.7 months in autograft. Clinically, there were 4 excellent, 9 good, 2 fair cases in allograft and 10 excellent, 11 good, 3 fair cases in autograft. CONCLUSIONS: Allograft was inferior to autograft in posterolateral lumbar fusion because allograft mixed with local bone reduced radiographic fusion grading and prolonged duration of bone fusion.
