Diagnosis and treatment of delayed infection after hip arthroplasty
- VernacularTitle:髋关节置换术后迟发性感染的诊断与治疗
- Author:
Jun LI
;
Tianyue ZHU
;
Licheng WEN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Arthroplasty, replacement, hip;
Prosthesis-related infections;
Reoperation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2000;0(11):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the methods of diagnosis and treatment for delayed infection after hip arthroplasty. Methods From March 1998 to April 2004, 11 patients with delayed infection after hip arthroplasty were analyzed retrospectively. There were 4 males and 7 females with average of 66 years, ranging from 49 to 81 years. The interval between infection and primary hip arthroplasty varied from 9 to 96 months(mean 25.5 months). Pain is the most common symptom in all patients with an infected hip arthroplasty. Abnormal ESR was observed in 9 cases. The increase of CRP was found in 8 patients, and fistula occurred in 5 patients. Radiography findings, such as loosening, osteolysis, and endosteal scalloping, are present on 10 patients. One-stage exchange arthroplasty was performed in 8 patients, among whom 7 prostheses with antibiotic-impregnated cement and one with plain cement for fixation were chosen. Two-stage exchange arthroplasty was performed in 3 patients. After thorough irrigation and debridement of the infected joint and the removal of the femoral and acetabular components, a temporary spacer with irrigation device and antibiotic-loaded beads or a bulb were inserted between the first and second stage. The interval was a minimum of 4 weeks. During the delayed reconstruction, the final prostheses were fixed with antibiotic-loaded cement after the infection was eliminated. Results All 11 patients were followed up for a period of 8 to 72 months. Fracture of femoral shaft happened during the debridement in one patient. None of recurrent infection was found during the average 29.3 months follow-up. Conclusion No test is 100 percent specific; therefore, the diagnosis of infection relies on the patients' history, and the physical examination findings, and the lab test combined with results of imaging study, etiology as well as pathology. The key to success is that the treatment must be tailored to the patients' status.
