Role of bone marrow stromal cells on rat spinal cord injury by vein transplantation
- VernacularTitle:静脉注射骨髓间质干细胞对脊髓损伤修复作用的实验研究
- Author:
Jianhua LIN
;
Shengmin LEI
;
Dezhi KANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Mesenchymal stem cells;
Bone marrow;
Spinal cord injuries;
Injections, intravenous
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
1996;0(09):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the efficacy of MSCs infused intravenously on the regeneration of injured spinal cord and rehabilitation of its neurological function. Methods 32 SD rats, male or female, weight about 300 g for each one. MSCs were separated, cultured and purified in vitro. Surface marker of MSCs, such as CD34, CD45, CD29 and CD90 were detected by flow cytometry. The rat spinal cord injury model was prepared according to the modified Allen method. After exposure of T10 spinal cord, the T10 segment of spinal cord was injuried by a 10 g weight falling down from 5 cm high place upon a round thin copper pad which was placed on the surface of T10 segment of spinal cord. The diameter of the copper pad is 3 mm. There are 24 rats in the injuried group and 8 in the non-injuried group. The injuried group was then divided into experiment group with 14 rats and control group with 10 rats at 24 hours after preparation of models. The rats in the injuried group and non-injuried group were infused with MSCs marked by Brdu through tail vein, and the rats in control group were infused with PBS. The neurological functions of rats were evaluated at 24 hours after injury and 1, 3, 5 weeks post-infusion respectively. At the same time, the immigration, survival and differentiation of MSCs were observed. Results The MSCs were uniformly CD29, CD90 positive and CD34, CD45 negative. In vivo experiment, transplanted MSCs survived and were localized to the injured spinal cord, and a few cells expressed NSE, MAP2 post transplantation 3 to 5 weeks. Significant improvement in functional outcome in rats treated with MSCs transplantation compared to control rats. The score of BBB in the treated group was higher than that in the control group (P
