Clinical Findings of Appendiceal Mucocele.
- Author:
Jin Bum CHO
1
;
Hang Joo CHO
;
Ok Ran SHIN
;
Kee Hawn KIM
;
Chang Hyeok AHN
;
Jeong Soo KIM
;
Seung Jin YOO
;
Keun Woo LIM
;
Ji Il KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. cmckji@catholic.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Appendix;
Mucocele;
Appendicitis
- MeSH:
Abdominal Pain;
Appendicitis;
Appendix;
Cystadenocarcinoma;
Cystadenoma;
Diagnosis, Differential;
Female;
Gastrointestinal Tract;
Humans;
Hyperplasia;
Incidence;
Incidental Findings;
Laparotomy;
Male;
Mucocele;
Rupture;
Stress, Psychological;
Tomography, X-Ray
- From:Journal of the Korean Surgical Society
2008;74(6):429-435
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: A mucocele of the appendix is an uncommon pathology, representing 0.2% to 0.3% of all appendix specimens. It is often diagnosed clinically as a result of its ability to cause signs and symptoms similar to those of acute appendicitis. If it is asymptomatic, it is often detected as an incidental finding during ultrasonography, computed tomography, radiographic examination of the gastrointestinal tract, or laparotomy. The purpose of this study was to identify the clinical features of mucocele of the appendix. METHODS: We describe 35 cases of mucocele of the appendix diagnosed at Uijeongbu St. Mary's hospital between January 1993 and December 2006. We analyzed demographic, clinical, and pathologic data of all the cases. RESULTS: A total of 12 males and 13 females with mean age of 54.7+/-14.9 years are described. The peak incidence occurred in the seventh decade (34.3%). Sixteen patients presented with symptoms and signs similar to those found in acute appendicitis. Ten patients complained of a palpable mass, 2 patients complained of non-specific abdominal pain, and 7 patients were asymptomatic. Fourteen cases were diagnosed preoperatively, and 3 cases were discovered incidentally. Pathologic examination revealed mucosal hyperplasia in 20% of the cases, cystadenoma in 71%, and cystadenocarcinoma in 9%. The mean age of cystadenocarcinoma patients was older than the mean age of mucosal hyperplasia patients, and the diameter of the appendix was larger in cystadenoma patients than in mucosal hyperplasia patients. CONCLUSION: The preoperative diagnosis of appendiceal mucocele is very important to make in order to facilitate treatment planning and avoid inadvertent rupture of the mucocele during operation. We recommend more diagnostic studies in cases of suspected mucocele. Mucocele of the appendix must be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with pain in the right iliac fossa, patients older than 40 years of age, patients suffering from long-term symptoms, and patient with a palpable mass in the right iliac fossa.
