Application of allograft bone for posterior spinal fusion in scoliosis
- VernacularTitle:同种异体与自体骨移植治疗脊柱侧凸的前瞻性研究
- Author:
Xisheng WENG
;
Guixing QIU
;
Junwei LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Scoliosis;
Spinal fusion;
Bone transplantation;
Transplantation, homologous
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
1996;0(10):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the efficacy of allograft bone in posterior spinal fusion in scoliosis. Methods From March 1995 to March 2000, 60 patients with scoliosis, who underwent posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion using allograft or autograft bone, were evaluated prospectively. All of the patients were randomized into group A (30 cases using only allograft bone) and group B(30 cases using autograft iliac bone).Among the patients in group A, there were 16 with congenital scoliosis, 12 with idiopathic scoliosis, 1 with neurofibromatsis scoliosis and Marfan syndrome respectively. The average age at surgery was 14 years 6 months. the average preoperative major curve was 86.6? with an average number of 8 fused segments (range, 4 to 10 segments). Whereas in group B, there were 15 with congenital scoliosis, 9 with idiopathic scoliosis, 5 with neurofibromtasis scoliosis and 1 with Marfan syndrome. The average age at surgery was 13 years and 8 months. The average preoperative major curve was 77.8? with an average number of 7 fused segments (range, 5 to 10 segments). The mean operative duration, average blood loss, complications and loss of correction between the two groups were analyzed comparatively. Results Each patient had a minimum 2-year follow-up with an average duration of 4 years 5 months. Group A was better than group B by a shorter operative duration, less blood loss. At last follow-up, the major curve measured an average of 44? (range, 31? to 72?) in group A and 41? (range, 24? to 68?) in group B respectively. There were 3 (10%) and 2 (6.7%) pseudoarthrosis occurred in group A and group B respectively. One superficial infection developed in group A. There was no significant difference of the average loss of correction and complication rate between the 2 groups. But there were 6 patients who had donor site pain in group B. Conclusion A satisfactory outcome can be achieved in posterior spinal fusion in scoliosis using allograft bone especially when a large amount of bone graft is needed.
