Comparative evaluation of open surgery and transurethral management for bladder outlet obstruction caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia of small volume
- VernacularTitle:小前列腺增生引起膀胱出口梗阻两种术式疗效分析
- Author:
Jincheng GENG
;
Liancheng FENG
;
Guohong SONG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Benign prostatic hypertrophy;
Bladder neck obstruction;
Surgical procedures,operative
- From:
Chinese Journal of Urology
2001;0(07):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate open surgery vs transurethral management for bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) of small volume. Methods From May 1993 to June 2002,50 patients were surgically treated.Of them 22 underwent open surgery and 28 underwent TURP plus transurethral incision of bladder neck(TUIBN).There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in age,disease course,preoperative prostate weight and the excised prostate weight.All the surgical procedures were conducted by the same urologist.The efficacy of open surgery and TURP plus TUIBN was comparatively evaluated by IPSS,Qmax and post void residual urine volume(PVR) and hospitalization days. Results The IPSS of those undergoing open surgery decreased from 24.6?3.8 of preoperation to 15.2?3.4 of postoperation ,and the Qmax increased from (8.3?2.9)ml/s to (9.5?3.6)ml/s,and the PVR decreased from(220.0?30.0)ml to(90.0?20.0)ml,and the postoperative hospital stay was 14.2 days.The IPSS of the patients undergoing TURP plus TUIBN decreased from 24.9?4.2 to 5.8?2.7,and the Qmax increased from (8.0?3.1)ml/s to (23.2? 3.8)ml/s,and the PVR decreased from(230.0?28.0)ml to(15.0?4.0)ml,and the postoperative hospital stay was 8.5 days.The postoperative improvement was much greater in the patients undergoing TURP plus TUIBN than those undergoing open surgery as assessed by IPSS,Qmax and PVR (all P
