Clinical application of Subtalar joint fusion with trephine
- VernacularTitle:环锯切骨融合距下关节治疗距下关节痛
- Author:
Huashui LIU
;
Shidong LIU
;
Tao LUAN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Subtalar joint;
Surgical instruments;
Osteotomy;
Arthralgia
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2001;0(01):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To introduce a new technique of talocalcaneal joint fusion with trephine and evaluate its clinical effects. Methods From June 1997 to October 2001, 18 cases complained of pain, weakness, limited range of motion and tenderness of ankle were treated with subtalar joint fusion. Of 18 cases, there were 12 males and 6 females with an average age of 47 years (range, 35 to 59 years). The lesions of subtalar joint were identified as traumatic osteoarthritis in 8, degenerative osteoarthritis in 5, congenital bone bridge in 2, rheumatoid arthritis in 2 and refractory inflammation of tarsal sinus. The AP and lateral view X-ray films were taken to measure the width and length of sutalar joint and talocalcaneal angle so as to choose the trephine of appropriate diameter (?11.5 mm, 12 mm, 13 mm )and guide the direction and length of osteotomy. Posterolateral approach was used in 14, and anterolateral approach in 4 depending on the location of lesion at subtalar joint. The trephine was inserted into subtalar joint slowly, the bone block inside the trephine was removed, rotated to 90?, then reimplanted in situ in 14 cases; Autograft of iliac crest was harvested and implanted by trephine in 4. Results All of the affected feet were immobilized with a cast postoperatively for 12 to 16 weeks. The patients were followed up for an average of 25 months ranging from 5 months to 4 years. All the wounds healed well at 2 weeks, the callus appeared at 4 weeks, and the bony fusion was obtained at 16 weeks displayed by postoperative X-ray films. The scores of ankle pain by VAS measurement were improved from preoperative 83.8 to postoperative 32.5. There were no severe complications, only 1 case suffered from dropping foot and recovered 10 months later, and 1 case complained of discomfort of foot. Conclusion Subtalar joint fusion with trephination is an effective procedure with many advantages such as: minimal invasive surgery, easy to perform, higher fusion rate and preserving mechanical stability of hind foot.
