The evaluation of clinical application of cervical pedicle screw system
- VernacularTitle:颈椎椎弓根螺钉内固定系统的临床应用
- Author:
Jingtang LIU
;
Tiansi TANG
;
Donglai WANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Cervical vertebrae;
Internal fixators;
Retrospective studies
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
1996;0(10):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To apply cervical pedicle screw system (CPSS) to treat cervical disorders and discuss its surgical indications, techniques and clinical effectiveness. Methods A total of 52 patients with middle and lower cervical spine lesions who underwent cervical transpedicular fixation were analyzed retrospectively. There were 41 males and 11 females aging from 16 to 62 years. The diagnosis of the patients were fractures and dislocations of cervical spine accompanied by complete paralysis (28 cases) or incomplete paralysis (19 cases) in 47 cases, and metastatic bone tumor in 5 cases. Prior to surgery, anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, CT scan through bone windows, and/or magnetic resonance images were carried out in all patients. During surgery, all screws were inserted into the pedicle under the guidance of lateral or oblique image intensifier to confirm the direction and insertion depth of screws. In 7 to 14 days after surgery, physical examination and roentgenograms evaluations were performed in all patients, and CT scans were obtained in 31 patients, the location of screws were evaluated with the radiographic examinations and CT scan. The follow-up period averaged 13 months (range, 1 to 36 months) in 38 patients. The authors experiences in achieving accurate pedicle screw insertion was introduced, the clinical value of using cervical pedicle screw system to manage cervical lesions was summarized, the possible complications of CPSS were analyzed, the candidates of using CPSS were discussed as well. Results Pedicle screws were inserted successfully in all cases, 9 cases were found to have nerve irritating symptoms by 10 pedicle screws when which were introduced into pedicles, however, by changing the direction of the screws, all symptoms disappeared and screws were successfully inserted. Postoperative radiographic evaluation confirmed proper insertion of screws except 2 screws perforating the lateral pedicle wall but without injury of the vertebral artery demonstrated on CT scans. In the followed-up, no screw breakage and loosening was observed. By applying distractive force between the screws placed into pedicles, the space between the affected vertebrae and discs could be increased, displaced anterior fragments of bone or disc could also be indirectly reduced from the spinal canal, and additional anterior decompression interventions might be avoided. Conclusion CPSS can be considered as one of alternative in posterior cervical internal fixation systems. However, specific caution must be taken. The candidates of utilizing CPSS should be properly selected.
