Self-rated Subjective Health Status Is Strongly Associated with Sociodemographic Factors, Lifestyle, Nutrient Intakes, and Biochemical Indices, but Not Smoking Status: KNHANES 2007-2012.
10.3346/jkms.2015.30.9.1279
- Author:
Sunmin PARK
1
;
Jaeouk AHN
;
Byung Kook LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Food and Nutrition, Hoseo University, Asan, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Keywords:
Self-rated Subjective Health Status;
Smoking;
Vitamin C;
HDL;
Serum Glucose
- MeSH:
Adolescent;
Adult;
Age Distribution;
Aged;
Aged, 80 and over;
Biomarkers/*blood;
Blood Glucose/*analysis;
*Diagnostic Self Evaluation;
Educational Status;
Female;
Health Behavior;
*Health Status;
Humans;
Income/statistics & numerical data;
*Life Style;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Nutrition Assessment;
Republic of Korea/epidemiology;
Sex Distribution;
Smoking/*epidemiology;
Socioeconomic Factors;
Young Adult
- From:Journal of Korean Medical Science
2015;30(9):1279-1287
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Despite advertised health warnings regarding the deadly hazards of smoking, many people have not heeded recommendations to quit smoking. We examined factors that affect self-rated subjective health status (SRH) scores among lifestyle, nutrient intake and biochemical parameters, and the association of SRH scores and smoking status in a large Korean adult population. Adjusted odd ratios for SRH were calculated for smoking status, selected biochemical data, and food and nutrient intake obtained using the 24-hr recall method after covariate adjustment in the 2007-2012 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (27,534 men and women aged > or = 20 yr). Age, sex, income, education, drinking, exercise and stress levels were associated with SRH scores, regardless of smoking status (P < 0.001). Interestingly, people in any smoking status groups considered the well-known indicators for metabolic diseases (HDL cholesterol, glucose, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase in the circulation), and the intake of fiber, total vitamins A, and vitamin C as indicators of SRH. Especially in current smokers, higher intake of nutritious food groups such as grains (OR = 1.227), vegetables (OR = 1.944), and milk (OR = 2.26) significantly increased the adjusted odds ratio of SRH. However, smoking status was not associated with SRH scores. In conclusion, SRH is affected by the indices related to health but not smoking status in Korean adults. The development of a new indicator of the direct adverse effects of smoking at regular health check-ups might be required to modulate the SRH in smokers and a nutritional education should not include the possible attenuation of adverse effects of smoking by good nutrition.
