Application of morselized bone grafting for the revision of loosened acetabular component
- VernacularTitle:颗粒骨植骨在髋臼翻修中的应用
- Author:
Jifang WANG
;
Shibi LU
;
Yan WANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Arthroplasty,replacement,hip;
Reoperation;
Acetabulum;
Wounds and Injuries;
Transplantion;
Bones
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2001;0(06):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To report the experience of the revision procedure with morselized bone grafting and a special design of acetabular prosthesis with three wings for loosened acetabular component in our hospital. Methods Since December 1989 to Junanry 1999, 23 cases with loosened acetabular component and bone defect were revised by morselized bone auto/allografting. There were 12 males and 11 females, the average age of the patients was 54.2 years old (range from 38 to 71 years old). The prosthesis of primary THA was double cup in 4 cases, the conventional THA in 19 cases, cemented in 22 cases and cementless in 1 cases. The severity of acetabular component loosening was classified into four types according to Gustillo: Type II in 3 cases, type III in 9 cases and type IV in 11 cases. The morselized bone autografting and allografting with size 4－ 6 mm were used in 6 cases and in 17 cases respectively. Different acetabular components had been used, the thread metal acetabular cup in 2 cases, screw fixed conventional metal acetabular cup in 10 cases and special design acetabular prosthesis with three wings in 11 cases. The latter prosthesis consists of an conventional acetabular component with pearl porous surface and three wings with different length and sharp edge distributed centrally in the superior lateral quadrant on the surface, the liner is made of UHMPE. Results No infection of the wound occurred in this group. The mean time of follow- up was 3 years and 8 months. Except 3 cases, all of the bone grafts was healed well and X－ ray showed that the containing of acetabular component was good, no translucent line between donor bone bed and prosthesis, and the bone defect had been repaired. The average Harris score was 47 before revision, and 86 after revision. The successful rate of revision was 86.9％ . There were 3 loosening cases postoperatively, 2 cases were due to incorrect position of prostheses and insufficient bone graft, another case was due to the screw being too short to fix the acetabular component. However, all of the three cases have partial bone growth in the original loosening acetabular. Conclusion 1. Direct contact between the morselized bone auto/allograft and the surface of metal acetabular component and the firm fixation of the prosthesis have showed good result of bone defect reconstruction. 2. The special design of acetabular prosthesis with three wings could be selected as an alternative method for huge bone loss of acetabulum (ranged from 64 to 79 mm), because it was able to enlarge the volume of the acetabular component.
