Endoscopic Primary Realignment under Open Cystostomy in the Patients with Posterior Urethral Rupture that were Impossible for Lithotomy Position, Accompanied by Pelvic Bone Fracture : Long-term Results.
10.4111/kju.2006.47.12.1361
- Author:
Jong Ryeul LIM
1
;
Han CHUNG
;
Jong Bouk LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, Gachon University of Medicine and Science, Incheon, Korea. jblee@ghilhospital.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Urethra;
Injury;
Surgery
- MeSH:
Cystoscopes;
Cystostomy*;
Erectile Dysfunction;
Follow-Up Studies;
Hematoma;
Hemorrhage;
Humans;
Intermittent Urethral Catheterization;
Male;
Neck;
Pelvic Bones*;
Quality of Life;
Rupture*;
Urethra;
Urethral Stricture;
Urinary Bladder;
Urinary Catheters;
Urinary Incontinence
- From:Korean Journal of Urology
2006;47(12):1361-1366
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term results of endoscopic primary realignment of a posterior urethral rupture accompanied by a pelvic bone fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study population consists of 7 patients who were able to be followed up for at least 5 years, of an initial 8 that underwent endoscopic primary realignment of a posterior urethral rupture due to a pelvic bone fracture. Operations were carried out in the following order; the bladder was incised to allow a metal sound, with stitching fiber then tied at its end so it could be advanced into the injured proximal urethra through the bladder neck. The fiber was then traced using a cystoscope and connected to a urethral catheter, which could be indwelled in the bladder by pulling the sound back. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 8.1 (5.2-9.7) years. The mean operation time was 48.3 (28-71) minutes. There were no severe disruptions of the pelvic hematoma, transfusions or other additive injuries during the operations. Post-operation complications were observed in 4 patients; 3 cases of mild urethral stricture, which were treated with an endoscopic intra-urethrotomy followed by clean intermittent catheterization, 3 cases of erectile dysfunction and 1 case each of urinary incontinence and a urethral stone. CONCLUSIONS: This study clearly implies that endoscopic primary realignment of a severe posterior urethral rupture accompanied by a pelvic bone fracture is less invasive and a safer method, without pelvic hemorrhage or additional injuries. Early endoscopic intervention also improves the quality of life by reducing the possibility of an invasive procedure, and also prevents severe urethral stricture and the resultant complications by maintaining the continuity of the urethra.
