Surface treatment of feldspathic porcelain: scanning electron microscopy analysis.
- Author:
Azam VALIAN
1
;
Elham MORAVEJ-SALEHI
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Air abrasion; Dental porcelain; Hydrofluoric acid; Scanning electron microscopy; Surface treatment
- MeSH: Aluminum Oxide; Ceramics; Dental Porcelain*; Hydrofluoric Acid; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning*; Porosity
- From:The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 2014;6(5):387-394
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: Topographic analysis of treated ceramics provides qualitative information regarding the surface texture affecting the micromechanical retention and locking of resin-ceramics. This study aims to compare the surface microstructure following different surface treatments of feldspathic porcelain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This in-vitro study was conducted on 72 porcelain discs randomly divided into 12 groups (n=6). In 9 groups, feldspathic surfaces were subjected to sandblasting at 2, 3 or 4 bar pressure for 5, 10 or 15 seconds with 50 microm alumina particles at a 5 mm distance. In group 10, 9.5% hydrofluoric acid (HF) gel was applied for 120 seconds. In group 11, specimens were sandblasted at 3 bar pressure for 10 seconds and then conditioned with HF. In group 12, specimens were first treated with HF and then sandblasted at 3 bar pressure for 10 seconds. All specimens were then evaluated under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at different magnifications. RESULTS: SEM images of HF treated specimens revealed deep porosities of variable sizes; whereas, the sandblasted surfaces were more homogenous and had sharper peaks. Increasing the pressure and duration of sandblasting increased the surface roughness. SEM images of the two combined techniques showed that in group 11 (sandblasted first), HF caused deeper porosities; whereas in group 12 (treated with HF first) sandblasting caused irregularities with less homogeneity. CONCLUSION: All surface treatments increased the surface area and caused porous surfaces. In groups subjected to HF, the porosities were deeper than those in sandblasted only groups.
