Patterns of Treatment for Metastatic Pathological Fractures of the Spine: The Efficacy of Each Treatment Modality.
10.4055/cios.2015.7.4.476
- Author:
Jae Hwan CHO
1
;
Jung Ki HA
;
Chang Ju HWANG
;
Dong Ho LEE
;
Choon Sung LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. spinecjh@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Neoplasm metastasis;
Spinal fractures;
Spontaneous fractures;
Treatment outcome
- MeSH:
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality/pathology;
Female;
Humans;
Liver Neoplasms/mortality/pathology;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Multiple Myeloma/mortality/pathology;
Retrospective Studies;
Spinal Fractures/etiology/mortality/*radiotherapy/*surgery;
Spinal Neoplasms/*complications/secondary;
Spine;
Treatment Outcome
- From:Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery
2015;7(4):476-482
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Metastatic pathological fractures of the spine are a major problem for cancer patients; however, there is no consensus on treatment strategy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate various treatment options by analyzing their patterns for metastatic pathological fractures of the spine. METHODS: In this study, 54 patients (male:female = 36:18) who were diagnosed with metastatic pathological fractures of spine were recruited. Demographic data, origin of cancer, type of treatment, and results were obtained from electronic medical records. Treatment options were divided into radiotherapy (RT), vertebroplasty (VP) or kyphoplasty (KP), operation (OP), and other treatments. Treatment results were defined as aggravation, no response, fair response, good response, and unknown. The survival time after detection of pathologic fractures was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 62.3 years. Hepatocellular carcinoma was the most common cancer of primary origin (n = 9), followed by multiple myeloma (n = 8). RT was the most common primary choice of treatment (n = 29, 53.7%), followed by OP (n = 13, 24.1%), and VP or KP (n = 10, 18.5%). Only 13 of 29 RT cases and 7 of 13 OP cases demonstrated a fair or good response. The mean survival time following detection of pathological spinal fractures was 11.1 months for 29 patients, who died during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: RT was the most common primary choice of treatment for metastatic pathological fractures of the spine. However, the response rate was suboptimal. Although OP should be considered for the relief of mechanical back pain or neurologic symptoms, care should be taken in determining the surgical indication. VP or KP could be considered for short-term control of localized pain, although the number of cases was too small to confirm the conclusion. It is difficult to determine the superiority of the treatment modalities, hence, a common guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of metastatic pathological fractures of the spine is required.
