Comparison of the complications of treatment of rectal cancer by laparoscopic versus conventional laparotomy procedure
- VernacularTitle:腹腔镜与传统开腹术治疗直肠癌的手术并发症比较
- Author:
Pingwu ZHAO
;
Chunhua XIANG
;
Dong WANG
;
Yujianbo XIAN
;
Guoqiang LI
;
Zhihua XU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Rectal Neoplasms/surg;
Surgery,Laparoscopy
- From:
Chinese Journal of General Surgery
2000;0(12):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the postoperative complications rate of total mesorectal excision(TME) performed by laparoscopic and conventional laparotomy method in treatment of rectal cancer.Methods The clinical data of patients with rectal cancer treated by laparoscopic surgery(n=42) or traditional laparotomy(n=50) were retrospectively analysed to analysis of the cause and occurrence rate of complications.(Results) The laparoscopic group had an advantage over the conventional laparotomy group in bowel movement recovery,earlier mobility and short hospital stay time.There was no difference in intraoperative injury,(anastomotic) leakage,sexual function preservation,long-term urinary dysfunction,and local recurrence or(incision) metastasis rates.Conclusions Laparoscopic TME treatment of rectal cancer had the same therapeutic effect as the conventional laparotomy procedure did,and has a better subjective outcome.
