Comparison between Cuprophane and Polysulfone Membrane in Biocompatibility.
- Author:
Jin Ho SHIN
1
;
Sang Yup HAN
;
So Young LEE
;
Young Sun KANG
;
Young Joo KWON
;
Heui Jung PYO
;
Kyung Shik OH
Author Information
1. Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Biocompatibility;
Hemodialysis;
Mem-brane;
Complement;
Oxygen;
Polymor phonudear leulaxyte;
Platelet
- MeSH:
Blood Platelets;
Complement C3a;
Complement System Proteins;
Dialysis;
Humans;
Kidney Failure, Chronic;
Membranes*;
Neutrophils;
Oxygen;
Platelet Count;
Renal Dialysis
- From:Korean Journal of Nephrology
2000;19(3):474-482
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: It has been proposed that the contact between blood and dialysis membrane during hemodialysis therapy induces harmful reactions to patients. Membrane biocompatibility is the characteristic that makes less adverse reaction. We tried to compare the biocompatibility between Cuprophane and Polysulfone membranes. MRTHODS: Nine chronic renal failure patients who have undergone maintenance hemrodialysis therapy with Hemophan membrane three times per week were included in this study. Cuprophane membranes were used in the first week: Hemophan membranes in the second week; Polysulfone membranes in the third week. Each membrane was used three times a week. On the day of third dialysis with the Cuprophane membrane(first week) and Polysulfone membrane(third week), serial blood sampling was obtained from the afferent line at hemodialysis initiation, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes and 30 minutes to measure serum complement activity(C3a, C5a), blood polymorphonuclear leukocyte and platelet count, and arterial oxygen pressure which have been regarded as biocompatibility parameters. The parameters measured during the first week(Cuprophane) and the third week(Polysulfone) were compared to evaluate the difference in biocompatibility of both membranes. RESULTS: 1) C3a desArg In both groups, the level of C3a desArg increased significantly from basal level and the Cuprophane group showed significantly higher level of C3a desArg than that of Polysulfone group. 2) C5a desArg : In both groups, the level of C5a desArg did not increased sigpificantly from basal level. Only at 30 minute after hemodialysis, Cuprophane group showed significantly higher level of C5a desArg than that of Polysulfone group(p=0.037). 3) Polymorphonuclear leukocyte : In both groups, the polymorphonuclear leukocyte counts decreased significantly at 15 minutes and 30 minutes from basal level. The polymorphonuclear leukocyte count was lower in Cuprophane group than that of Polysulfone group at 15 minute after hemodialysis(p=0.001). 4) Platelet: In Cuprophane group, the platelet count was decreased significantly at 15 minute(p=0.004) but there were no difference in platelet counts between the two groups. 5) Arterial oxygen pressure Both group showed no consistent pattern of variation of oxygen pressure and there was no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The biocompatibility of Polysulfone membrane was superior to the Cuprophane membrane with respect to the increased activation of complement C3a. decrease of polymorphonuclear leukocyte and decrease of platelet count.
