Diagnosis and treatment of blunt pancreatic injury
- VernacularTitle:闭合性胰腺损伤的诊断和治疗
- Author:
Xianghai LAN
;
Hongliang DONG
;
Yejiang ZHOU
;
Yuanzheng WANG
;
Liyi WAN
;
Liang XU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
PANCREAS/inj;
WOUNDS,NONPENETRATING
- From:
Chinese Journal of General Surgery
2001;0(10):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To study the diagnosis and treatment of blunt pancreatic injury (BPI). Methods A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 58 cases of BPI admitted and treated in our hospital during 23 years. Results The positive diagnosis rate was 51.1%(23/45) for single BUS examination ,but 70.0%(21/30) for two and more BUS examimations. The positive diagnosis rate was 65.0%(26/40) for single CT scanning, but 91.3%(21/23) for two and more CT scannings. Twenty-five cases(25/37,67.6%) with BPI were determined preoperatively, and 12 cases(12/37,32.4%)during (operation).Thirty-seven cases underwent operatiom, included grade I in 10cases、grade II 13cases、grade III 9cases、 grade IV 4cases and gradeV 1case. Twenty-one cases received nonoperative treatment, included 11 grade in I,7 grade II and 3 grade III. In the entire group, 6 cases died(10.4%).The mortality in the operation group was 16.2%(6/37).There were no deaths in the nonoperative group. The main cause of death was multiorgan failure(5/6,83.3%). There were 11(19.0%)cases of pancreatic pseudocyst after treatment in the entire group, included 3(3/37,8.1%) in operation group and 8(8/21,38.1%) in nonoperation group. Conclusions The diagnosis of BPI should combine the clinical findings with repeated BUS and CT scanning. Nonoperative treatment is a good choice for BPI without main pancreatic duct injury. Operative treatment is suitable for serious BPI and those with other intra-abdominal organ jnjury.
