A comparison of efficacy of continuous epidural infusion of 0.2% levobupivacaine and 0.2% ropivacaine for postoperative pain relief
- VernacularTitle:0.2%左旋布比卡因与罗哌卡因持续硬膜外泵注镇痛效应的比较
- Author:
Rongsheng LI
;
Shouzhang SHE
;
Hongfeng ZHOU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Analgesia, epidural;
Bupivacaine;
Amides
- From:
Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
1994;0(01):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the analgesic efficacy and safety of continuous epidural infusion of 0.2% levobupivacaine in patients after lower abdominal surgery.Methods Sixty ASA Ⅰ - Ⅱ patients undergoing lower abdominal gynecologic operation under epidural anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups : group L levobupivacaine (n = 30) and group R ropivacaine ( n = 30) . An epidural catheter was placed at L2-3 . After operation the catheter was connected through a 3-way Stopcock to a Graseby 9 500 infusion pump for continuous infusion of 0.2% levobupivacaine or 0.2% ropivacaine at a rate of 4 ml?h-1 and a Graseby 3300 infusion pump for PCEA with 0.01% morphine (bolus dose = 2ml, lockout interval = 10 min, total dose limit = 16 ml?4 h-1) (1) VAS score (0 = no pain, 100 = severe pain). (2) the ratio of the number of attempts calculated (D1) to the number of successfully delivered doses (D2) (D1/D2), (3) modified Bromage Motor scale score, (4) Bruggmann comfort scale (BCS), (5) Ramsay sedation score and (6) the severity of side effects were recorded 0, 2,4, 8, 12, 20 and 24h after operation.Results The demographic data (age, body weight, height) and duration of operation were comparable between the two groups. The analgesia was satisfactory in both groups. VAS scores were significantly lower in levobupivacaine group than that in ropivacaine group at 8 and 24 h after operation ( P
