Practice status of specialized agencies for occupational health management of small- to medium-size enterprises and the factors improving their performance: a cross-sectional survey study.
10.1186/s40557-017-0161-4
- Author:
Saerom LEE
1
;
Jun Pyo MYONG
;
Eun A KIM
;
Huisu EOM
;
Bowha CHOI
;
Young Joong KANG
Author Information
1. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency, Jongga-ro 400, Jung-gu, Ulsan, 44419 Republic of Korea. cnergy14@gmail.com.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Occupational health management;
Specialized agency;
Work performance;
Workers' health exam;
Occupational health services
- MeSH:
Cross-Sectional Studies*;
Delivery of Health Care;
Employment;
Follow-Up Studies;
Health Promotion;
Life Style;
Occupational Health Services;
Occupational Health*;
Outsourced Services;
Postal Service;
Referral and Consultation;
Surveys and Questionnaires;
Task Performance and Analysis;
Work Performance
- From:Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
2017;29(1):4-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: We examined the current status of specialized agencies for occupational health management (SAs) and their workforce. Furthermore, we aimed to clarify the current practice status of SA healthcare professionals and factors that influence their performance. METHODS: To examine the current SA workforce, we analyzed data from the 2014 Survey of Current Status of SA and their Workforce from the Ministry of Employment and Labor (MOEL). Furthermore, we mailed out an original questionnaire to SA professionals to determine their current health management status and factors that affect their performance. Data from the respondents (N = 384) were analyzed. RESULTS: In 2014, the workforce performing health management in SAs comprised 232 physicians, 507 nurses, and 312 occupational hygienists, with no significant regional differences in the distribution of physicians and nurses. According to the findings of the questionnaire, the average daily number of worker consultations by physicians and nurses was 22.8, while the average time taken for health management ranged from 74.3 to 104.3 min, depending on the size of the firm. Most of the respondents (41.5%) answered that they were following-up on more than 80% of individuals with illnesses. Among health management tasks, performance scores of “consultations for general diseases” and “consultations for lifestyle habits” were relatively high, whereas health promotion activities at workplaces were relatively low. There was a significant correlation between the utilization of general and special health examination results and task performance. CONCLUSION: Among health management tasks, follow-up management of individuals with illnesses and consultations for disease/lifestyle habits were relatively well performed, whereas health promotion activities at workplaces were not performed well. Among factors that positively influenced SA performance at workplaces, only the utilization of health examination results had significant effects. Therefore, to accomplish health management goals and perform effective health management at workplaces, there is a need to establish a comprehensive system of occupational health service outsourcing integrating health examinations and health management services. Furthermore, the current task system, which focuses on follow-up management, should be expanded to incorporate preventive and health promotion functions—the fundamental functions of occupational health services (OHS).
