Clinical analysis of ano-saving surgery in low rectal carcinoma
- VernacularTitle:低位直肠癌保肛手术临床分析
- Author:
Gaohong DONG
;
Fanghai HAN
;
Zhaoda ZHANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
RECTAL NEOPLASMS/surg;
SPHINCTER-PRESERVING SURGERY;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION
- From:
Chinese Journal of General Surgery
2000;0(11):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo evaluate the indication, the operation pattern and therapeutic effect of the ano-saving surgery in low rectal carcinoma. MethodsAccording to anorectal finger-examination, IRUS,and CT, 94 out the 161 rectal cancer patients were selected to have ano-saving surgery from August 1993 to December 1994.Excreting function, 5-year survival rate and local recurrence rate of the various operation were compared. ResultsThe perfomed rate of ano-saving operation in low rectal cancer was 58.4%. Among them, low anastomosis was done in 6 cases, ultra-low anastomosis in 48 cases,Park′s operation in 25 cases,and Bacon operation in15 . The death rate was 2.1%(2 cases).Incidence of anastomotic leakage after the surgery was 3.2%(3 cases), and only 13 cases had anastomotic narrowing(13.8%) within 1 year. The successful rates of excreting function after the surgery were respectively as follows: low anastomosis 100%, ultra-low anastomosis 97.9%,Park′s surgery 88.0%,and Bacon surgery 53.3%. The 5 year survival rates and the local recurrence rates were respectively,as follows: low anastomosis 83.3% and 0; ultra-low anastomosis 79.2% and 4.2%; Park′s 64.0% and 12.0%; and Bacon 66.7% and 13.3%,respectively. ConclusionsUltra-low colo rectum anastomosis becomes the main operative pattern to preserve anal sphincter in low rectal cancer.There is no difference in the 5-year survival rate and the excreting function among low, ultra-low anastomosis and Park′s operation, but the low and ultra-low colo-rectum anastomosis were obviously better than that of Bacon and Miles operation.The local recurrence rates of low and ultra-low colon-rectum anastomosis are lower than that of Miles′.There is no difference in the 5-year survival rate and local recurrence rate between Park′s, Bacon and Miles operation.
