Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Four Therapeutic Schemes for Treating Peptic Ulcer Bleeding
- VernacularTitle:4种治疗消化性溃疡出血用药方案的费用-效果分析
- Author:
Jiane CHENG
;
Jing WANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
peptic ulcer bleeding;
famotidine;
omeperazole;
reptilase;
pharmacoeconomics;
cost-effectiveness analysis
- From:
China Pharmacy
1991;0(05):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the economic effectiveness of different pharmacotherapeutic schemes for the same disease.METHODS:Using pharmacoeconomical cost-effectiveness analysis,four therapeutic schemes for treating peptic ulcer bleeding,schemes A,B,C and D,were compared.RESULTS:The total effect rate of scheme A was the lowest(61.53%).The cost-effectiveness ratios of A,B,C and D were 1.09,10.70,10.74,17.20,respectively.Using sensitivity analysis;the cost-effectiveness ratios were 0.98,9.63,9.66,15.48,respectively.CONCLUSION:Among the four schemes,scheme C was the best one.
