Comparison of 0.75% ropivacaine and 0.75% bupivicaine for CSEA in patients undergoing cesarean section
- VernacularTitle:0.75%罗比卡因与0.75%布比卡因腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉应用于剖宫产手术的评价
- Author:
Mu JIN
;
Bingxue CHEN
;
Jiefang TAN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Amides;
Bupivacaine;
Anesthesia, spinal;
Anesthesia, epidural;
Cesarean section
- From:
Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
1994;0(06):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 0.75% ropivacaine versus 0.75% bupivicaine for combined spinal and epidural anesthesia(CSEA) for cesarean section. Methods Forty primiparae(ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ) scheduled for elective cesarean section were divided into two groups: ropivacaine group received 0.75% ropivacaine 1 .2-1 . 4ml(9-10. 5mg) for spinal anesthesia and bupivicaine group received same amount of 0.75% bupivicaine. During operation when spinal analgesia was inadequate, 1.6% lidocaine was supplemented via epidural catheter. Blood pressure , heart rate and SpO2 were monitored. Sensory block(pin prick), motor block(modified Bromage scale), quality of analgesia and relaxation of abdominal wall were assessed. Apgar score of the neonates and umbilical artery blood gas as well as side effects were recorded. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, height, body weight of the patients and duration of operation. The height of block was comparable between the two groups but the onset time was longer and duration of block was shorter in ropivacaine group. Analgesia and muscle relaxation were satisfactory and Apger score was 10 at 1 mm and 5mm in both groups. Blood gas values were within normal range in both groups. Motor block was weaker with ropivacaine than that with bupivacaine(P
