Effect of multidisciplinary collaborations in control of peritoneal dialysis patients with hypertension
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2017.09.001
- VernacularTitle:医护药协同工作模式对腹膜透析患者血压的影响
- Author:
Shaoli WU
;
Minyan XIE
;
Minlan JIANG
;
Shuzhen HE
;
Jiaying XIE
;
Yun TONG
;
Yanfen YE
- Keywords:
Peritoneal dialysis;
Hypertension;
Multidisciplinary collaborations
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2017;33(9):641-646
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the application effect of the multidisciplinary collaborations in control of peritoneal dialysis patients with hypertension. Methods A total of 220 cases of peritoneal dialysis patients divided into experimental group and control group (each group had 110 cases) according to the random number table. In which, the control group received routine capacity control and health education with a total of 105 patients finished the study. The experimental group received of multidisciplinary collaborations on the basis of routine capacity control and health education with a total of 107 patients finished the study. Observe changes with knowledge of drugs, medication compliance, self-management behavior and blood pressure of patients before and after the intervention respectively. Results In experimental group,the scores of drug knowledge, medication compliance and self-management behaviors were (0.93 ± 0.49), 0.00 (0.00, 0.25), (2.69 ± 0.25) points before the intervention, 6 months after the intervention were (1.17 ± 0.54), 0.25 (0.00, 0.50), (2.86 ± 0.15) points, the difference between the groups was statistically significant (t=38.60, Z=4.34, t= 2.45, P < 0.01 or 0.05). In control group,the scores of drug knowledge, medication compliance and self-management behaviors were (0.87 ± 0.45), 0.00 (0.00, 0.25), (2.64 ± 0.27) points before the intervention, 6 months after the intervention were (0.89 ± 0.43), 0.00 (0.00, 0.38), (2.73 ± 0.27) points, there was no significant difference between drug knowledge and medication compliance (t=0.44, Z=1.83, P > 0.05), there were statistically significant differences in self-management behavior (t=6.23, P<0.01);there was no difference between the statistical significance between the 2 groups before intervention (t=1.02, Z=1.46, t=1.32, P > 0.05); there was significant difference between the 2 groups after intervention (t=4.11, Z=4.03, t=4.34, P<0.01). Patients in the experimental group with the systolic and diastolic blood pressure were (147.11 ± 14.31), (90.16 ± 13.02) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) respectively, before the intervention; 6 months after the intervention were (139.39 ± 17.05), (83.76 ± 12.52) mmHg respectively, the difference was statistically significant (t=3.59, 2.92, P<0.01). The control group before intervention were (149.56 ± 18.11), (93.56 ± 15.09) mmHg respectively, 6 months after the intervention were (145.14±20.50), (88.14±10.88) mmHg respectively, the difference was statistically significant (t=2.02, 2.72, P<0.05 or 0.01);there was no significant difference between the two groups before intervention (t=1.09, 1.82, P>0.05);6 months after the intervention there was significant difference between the 2 groups (t=2.22, 2.72, P < 0.05 or 0.01). Conclusions Multidisciplinary collaborations have a significant role in patients with peritoneal dialysis, especially in blood pressure control, medication compliance and self-management behavior.
