Influence of high quality nursing mode on the quality of life in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography patients
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2017.08.005
- VernacularTitle:优质护理模式对经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术患者护理质量的影响
- Author:
Jie ZHANG
;
Xuejie JIANG
;
Meiyan WANG
;
Ni ZHAO
- Keywords:
Cholangiopancreatography;
endoscopic retrograde;
High quality nursing care;
Conventional nursing;
Quality of care
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2017;33(8):579-582
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To study the influence of high quality nursing mode on the quality of life in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) patients. Methods A total of 292 patients with ERCP were randomly divided into control group and observation group with 146 cases in each group by the randomized block design method. The control group was given the conventional nursing care. The observation group was given the high quality nursing care based on the conventional nursing care. The score of Quality of Life of the World Health Organization (WHOQOL- 100), Quality of Life Index of Gastrointestinal Tract (GIQLI), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) before and after nursing care were observed and compared. The difference impact of two kinds of nursing mode on nursing quality between two groups was evaluated. Results WHOQOL-100 score in the observation group after treatment, including physiology and psychology and environment and social relations state such as grading, was respectively (59.3 ± 6.0), (61.8 ± 7.2), (60.3 ± 6.2), (62.8 ± 7.3) points and GIQLI index included self-conscious symptom and body physiological status and daily and social activities,such as state of emotional and psychological and the overall score, was respectively (79.8±4.9), (19.8±1.8), (14.7±1.9), (19.2±2.8), (105.7±6.6) points, which was (50.9±6.3), (52.5±6.7), (51.4±5.6), (53.4±7.1), (67.2±4.8), (15.6±1.9), (10.2±1.8), (16.3±2.3), (94.4 ± 6.2) points in control group, the difference between two groups was statistically significantly(t=1.876-2.327, P<0.05). HAMA score and SAS scores and SDS score and VAS score in the observation group after nursing was respectively (24.28 ± 4.78), (29.48 ± 6.54), (30.55 ± 7.32), (4.55 ± 1.18) points and respectively (36.68 ± 5.39), (41.72 ± 6.03), (42.65 ± 7.21), (6.07 ± 1.17) points in the control group, the difference between two groups was statistically significantly(t=2.876-4.012, P<0.05). Conclusions High quality nursing mode of ERCP in patients with perioperative patients of psychological and physiological all have different degrees of improvement and is suitable for popularization and application in clinic.
